Fieldwire vs Procore: Hidden Features That Matter for Construction Teams

Bluebeam vs Procore: Which Works Better for Your Job Site?

Buildertrend vs Procore vs Cortex: Best Construction Project Management Software

Your project budget lives or dies by the financial structure of construction software. A look at how these platforms charge reveals big differences between the market leaders.<h3>Procore&#39;s volume-based pricing explained</h3>Procore bases its pricing strategy on your Annual Construction Volume (ACV) – the total value of construction work across your projects. Instead of charging per user, Procore takes an upfront annual fee based on this ACV percentage, which usually runs between 0.1% to 0.2% of project cost. To put this in real terms, a $20 million project could cost you between $20,000-$40,000 each year.This pricing model comes with several money-saving benefits:<ul class="list-bullet"><li value=1>Unlimited users: Your entire project team – subcontractors, clients, and vendors included – gets access without extra licensing fees</li><li value=2>Unlimited storage: Store all your documents, photos, emails, and files without limits</li><li value=3>No hidden fees: You get all support, updates, and improvements as standard</li></ul>Companies running multiple big projects can use Procore&#39;s multi-year pools. This lets them set contract volume for the entire term and use it anytime during that period. Their renewal rate protection also locks in future pricing, so you know what you&#39;ll pay in coming years.<h3>Autodesk&#39;s modular licensing structure</h3>Autodesk Build takes a different approach with its tier-based licensing model that focuses on individual users and their document needs. The standard pricing has three tiers based on sheet limits:<ul class="list-bullet"><li value=1>550-Sheet Limit: €515/£455/$470 USD per user annually</li><li value=2>5,000-Sheet Limit: €910/£805/$830 USD per user annually</li><li value=3>Unlimited Sheets: €1,685/£1,490/$1,550 USD per user annually</li></ul>Your sheet count shows the total number of drawings you can access across all your member projects. Going over your limit means losing project access until you upgrade or leave some projects to reduce your sheet count.Autodesk counts one sheet as a drawing that goes through the Sheet publishing workflow. Documents in the Files area don&#39;t count toward this limit. This makes Autodesk&#39;s model easier to predict for companies that know their document management needs.Autodesk sometimes runs special deals, like their recent offer of Unlimited sheet access at the 5,000-sheet price. They aimed this promotion at regions where sheet-based pricing wasn&#39;t common.<h3>Which model offers better cost control for large firms?</h3>Large construction firms face distinct financial choices between these pricing models:Procore&#39;s percentage-based model links costs directly to construction volume, whatever your usage patterns. This works best for firms that:<ul class="list-bullet"><li value=1>Need lots of team collaboration</li><li value=2>Want all-in-one pricing without counting users</li><li value=3>Like unlimited storage and support with no extra charges</li></ul>All the same, this model can squeeze budgets during downturns since costs stay fixed even as revenue drops.Autodesk&#39;s user-based approach gives you:<ul class="list-bullet"><li value=1>Modular licensing: You only pay for tools you need</li><li value=2>Usage-based scaling: Costs match your active project needs</li><li value=3>Flexible budgeting: You can adjust licenses when projects slow down</li></ul>Enterprise operations with changing project loads might protect their margins better with Autodesk&#39;s model during uncertain times. But costs can jump quickly as you add users across multiple projects.Your best choice depends on your workflow, how stable your project portfolio is, and what you need for collaboration. Companies with steady, high-volume construction might love Procore&#39;s unlimited approach. Those with variable project loads could save more with Autodesk&#39;s scalable user model.

Pricing Models: Autodesk Build vs Procore

Construction software comes with more than just the advertised price tag. Studies show these hidden costs can inflate the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) by up to 90% throughout a software&#39;s lifecycle.<h3>Training and onboarding expenses</h3>Your construction management platform&#39;s accessible interface directly affects training costs. Software that looks affordable at first might just need substantial investment to educate employees. Smaller contractors using Procore (USD 5-20M annual revenue) spend around USD 10,000 on implementation and simple training. Mid-sized firms put in USD 20,000-60,000, while large multi-division companies shell out over USD 100,000 for detailed rollouts.Autodesk&#39;s training packages come with specific hour allocations:<ul class="list-bullet"><li value=1>Quick Start Hybrid Implementation has 12 hours of remote services plus two days onsite</li><li value=2>Construction Ops Implementation offers 25 hours of combined customer-facing and internal preparation time</li><li value=3>Cost Management Implementation gives you 24 hours of configuration and training services</li></ul>Staff turnover makes these expenses even bigger. The cost to recruit, hire, and train new people, plus lost productivity during onboarding, can substantially affect your profits.<h3>Third-party integration fees</h3>Teams often underestimate the extra expenses when connecting construction software with existing systems. These integration costs add up:API fees change based on usage volume or subscription models. Many software vendors charge when you access their Application Programming Interface, which makes different applications talk to each other.Custom integrations need specialists or dedicated internal IT staff. Even with available APIs, developers must build and manage connections between systems.Platform compatibility checks must happen before implementation. When systems don&#39;t work together, expensive development work bridges these gaps.Procore and Autodesk handle integrations in different ways. Procore users say they often need third-party workarounds to merge design models, RFIs, and field data, which creates inefficient workflows and possibly more errors.<h3>Data migration and setup costs</h3>Moving to either platform needs careful planning for data migration. The process involves:Setup and configuration costs go beyond software installation. Time and resources go into setting up workflows, customizing settings, and lining up the platform with your organization&#39;s needs.Clean data before migration stops errors from moving to the new system. This essential prep work adds many hours to implementation.Vendor implementation services like Autodesk&#39;s Build Standardization Workshop package (twenty hours remote plus sixteen hours onsite) cost premium rates.Companies switching platforms should use a step-by-step approach. Wolgast Construction made a smooth switch from Procore to Autodesk with a gradual implementation that managed to keep projects running.<h3>Support and maintenance charges</h3>Support needs cost 15-20% of the original development costs each year. These costs include:Support tiers with different response times and service levels. Better response times or dedicated account managers mean paying more.Bug fixes, updates, and technical help come with maintenance fees. Some vendors charge extra for these simple services.Apps need troubleshooting and development resources even when they&#39;re mature. Simple systems might need just a few hours monthly, while critical applications take 40-80 hours of support.Procore charges fixed yearly costs whatever your actual usage, which limits flexibility when markets slow down. Autodesk users report quicker onboarding, simpler administration, and better team control, but these benefits come with their own support costs.

Hidden Costs Construction Teams Often Overlook

Marketing claims about construction software often hide the real picture of what features you get. A closer look at Procore and Autodesk shows big differences in what they can do and what they focus on.<h3>Autodesk&#39;s BIM-first approach and its implications</h3>Autodesk Construction Cloud builds its entire ecosystem around <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Building_information_modeling">Building Information Modeling</a> (BIM). This changes how teams work with project data throughout the construction lifecycle. The platform does more than just manage documents - it brings BIM value from design right into construction.The system creates a smooth data flow from design to construction. Your models stay available and useful even after handover, they don&#39;t just sit in files. This gives you real benefits:<ul class="list-bullet"><li value=1>80% time savings in solving RFIs through immediate model access</li><li value=2>50% less labor during project closeout with Forms for punchlist templates</li><li value=3>250+ standardized checklists using Forms in Autodesk Construction Cloud</li></ul>This BIM-first approach comes with trade-offs. Users say Autodesk Build shines in design coordination but falls short with estimating tools. Teams without BIM knowledge face a steep learning curve. Many construction firms don&#39;t use Autodesk&#39;s advanced modeling features much, so they pay for tools they rarely touch.<h3>Procore&#39;s strength in field collaboration</h3>Procore built its platform specifically for construction management rather than design coordination. You can see this in its field-focused tools that put practical site management first.The Action Plans tool shows this approach by putting inspections, forms, specifications, drawings, documents, and submittals in one place. The Correspondence tool creates a complete system to capture all project communications and cuts down on mix-ups.Procore&#39;s 3D model features work right in the field. A project manager said it best: &quot;Procore BIM puts 3D models in the hands of the people actually installing and proving the work in the field, so the work gets done right the first time&quot;. This shows a key difference, Procore puts field usability ahead of design complexity.The &quot;Follow Me&quot; feature proves this focus by letting multiple users guide through a model at once and see exactly what others view in real-time. Field teams can avoid communication problems that pop up when working with complex designs.<h3>Overlapping tools that inflate costs</h3>Both platforms have duplicate features that can drive up your tech spending. They both offer:<ol class="list-number"><li value=1>Document management capabilities</li><li value=2>RFI and submittal tracking</li><li value=3>Issue/punchlist management</li><li value=4>Drawing markup tools</li></ol>This overlap often leads construction firms to pay twice for the same features. One project site used both systems: &quot;Between the two, PlanGrid works better for people without a constant internet connection. But Procore works very well with the mobile app, submittals, and drawing updates&quot;.Both companies created integrations to fix this overlap. Procore&#39;s Documents plugin for Autodesk lets users work with project files in Navisworks, Revit, and AutoCAD. Autodesk offers WorkBridge by ProjectReady to move content from Procore to Autodesk Construction Cloud.Your choice between these platforms should line up with your main workflows. Teams that rely heavily on BIM coordination and design collaboration will get more value from Autodesk. But if field execution and subcontractor management drive your work, Procore&#39;s construction-focused platform might serve you better.

Feature Depth: What You Get vs What You Think You Get

Mobile capabilities can make or break your day at construction sites where connectivity changes by the minute. Sales demos might not show much difference between Procore and Autodesk&#39;s mobile offerings. The real test comes when you&#39;re stuck in a basement with no signal.<h3>Offline access and live sync</h3>Construction sites rarely have good internet connections, and both platforms handle offline functionality in their own way.Procore&#39;s mobile app lets you work without connectivity, but there are key limits. You can only see items you&#39;ve previously viewed and cached on your device. You need to plan ahead and view your drawings, RFIs, and punch list items while online before going to areas without connection. Your changes sync back to the main system as soon as you get back online.Autodesk Construction Cloud takes a different path. The platform builds offline work into its core, with data syncing to mobile devices so you can access everything whatever your connection status. Field teams can save any view into the viewer for offline access within seconds. The platform even shows an offline indicator with a &quot;Go Online&quot; button to help users know their connection status.Users in the field say that &quot;PlanGrid works better for people without a constant internet connection&quot;. This gives Autodesk the upper hand in places with poor coverage.<h3>Field reporting and photo documentation</h3>Construction teams find photo documentation one of their most useful mobile tools. Both platforms give you detailed options to capture and organize site images.Procore&#39;s Photos tool lets users &quot;snap, store, share, and comment on project photos without the hassle&quot;. Teams get unlimited photo storage with no file size charges, so you never worry about documentation limits. Your field teams can take pictures from any device, mark them up right away, and connect them to drawing locations for better context.Procore links everything together, photos automatically go into daily reports and sort into searchable project galleries. You can see this visual project history from anywhere.Autodesk Build (formerly PlanGrid) markets itself as &quot;construction productivity software built for the field&quot;. Its mobile tools focus on:<ul class="list-bullet"><li value=1>Smooth offline access to critical project documents</li><li value=2>Detailed field reporting tools</li><li value=3>Mobile markup capabilities</li><li value=4>Integrated photo and video documentation</li></ul>These features help field operations by keeping office and field teams connected even in areas with poor signals.<h3>User feedback on mobile usability</h3>Users share mixed viewpoints when comparing these platforms&#39; mobile features. A construction professional said: &quot;Procore works extremely well with the mobile app, submittals, and drawing updates&quot;. Another noted that Autodesk Build &quot;has a more modern look and accessibility features&quot;.These different opinions show each platform&#39;s priorities. Users often praise Autodesk for its easy-to-use document navigation. One user put it this way: &quot;Plangrid is unrivaled for internal document distribution and sharing in the construction industry. The speed at which documents are navigatable...&quot;.Other professionals say &quot;Procore leaps and bounds better than any other product on the market&quot;. They like its detailed functionality but sometimes mention its complex interface.The bottom line? Both platforms give you solid mobile features with different strengths. Your choice depends on which mobile workflows your field teams need most and which interface they like better.

Mobile Capabilities in the Field

The effectiveness of construction software depends on its ability to work with your existing tech stack. Procore and Autodesk understand this reality, but their integration methods show a big difference that affects your processes and long-term costs.<h3>Autodesk&#39;s native design tool integrations</h3>Autodesk Construction Cloud provides over 400 pre-built integrations with ERPs, CRMs, document management, analytics tools, and other essential business systems. This vast network creates a connected technology ecosystem that &quot;taps into innovation&#39;s full potential&quot; for their customers.Autodesk stands out through its continuous connection between design and construction phases. Their platform offers:<ul class="list-bullet"><li value=1>Direct links to AutoCAD, Revit, Navisworks, and BIM Collaborate workflows</li><li value=2>A unified system that combines design collaboration, document management, and field execution</li><li value=3>Model coordination capabilities within the same ecosystem</li></ul>The company has added nine new integrations. These include Assuro for bank guarantees, Atom for crane-mounted cameras, and WorkBridge to move content from Procore.This native design-to-construction link creates what they call &quot;a single source of truth for all project teams&quot;. Construction firms using Autodesk&#39;s design tools can avoid expensive data transfers between systems.<h3>Procore&#39;s app marketplace and open API</h3>Procore takes a different path from Autodesk, positioning itself as &quot;the first all-in-one solution that doesn&#39;t believe it has to build all the solutions&quot;. Their strategy focuses on extensibility and third-party connections.Procore&#39;s ecosystem includes over 500 integrations and apps across analytics, estimating, CRM, BIM, accounting, and payroll categories. Users can access these through their App Marketplace, which aims to create &quot;an ecosystem of technology solutions that touch all areas of construction management&quot;.Procore API, their open interface that supports custom development, forms the foundation. This API lets construction firms:<ul class="list-bullet"><li value=1>Create custom applications and connections on top of Procore</li><li value=2>Extract valuable insights from project data</li><li value=3>Use Procore as their main system of record</li></ul>Developers get access to OAuth 2.0 authentication, sandbox environments for testing, and integration development resources. Construction teams can create specialized workflows beyond Procore&#39;s built-in features with this open approach.<h3>How integration affects total cost of ownership</h3>Your choice between these integration ecosystems will shape your <a href="https://www.techtarget.com/searchdatacenter/definition/TCO">total cost of ownership</a> (TCO). Integration resourcing costs make up most (54.8%-65.6%) of the overall integration expenses during a typical seven-year period.Organizations often underestimate these integration costs when comparing platforms. Annual maintenance for custom integrations costs 15-20% of the original development expense. Integration issues create expensive operational risks through:<ul class="list-bullet"><li value=1>System failures causing downtime</li><li value=2>Incorrect data moving between systems</li><li value=3>Teams spending time fixing integration problems</li></ul>Connecting construction software with existing systems becomes more complex and expensive as time passes.Custom-built integrations require you to factor in regular upgrades, compatibility issues, and specialized technical staff. Platform-managed integrations offer more predictable costs because vendors handle maintenance and updates.Construction firms must evaluate Autodesk&#39;s native design connections against Procore&#39;s extensive app marketplace. The best choice depends on your current technology investments and which platform better fits your core business systems.

Integration Ecosystem and Workflow Automation

Construction software platforms are battling it out over AI capabilities. Complex projects need teams that can spot problems early. This foresight helps avoid delays that can get pricey.<h3>Autodesk&#39;s Construction IQ and risk forecasting</h3>AI sits at the heart of Autodesk&#39;s strategy. Construction IQ uses machine learning to spot potential issues by analyzing project data. This tech looks for patterns across millions of construction activities and flags high-risk items that teams might miss.Construction IQ targets three main areas:<ul class="list-bullet"><li value=1>Risk identification in submittals, RFIs, and issues</li><li value=2>Quality control on jobsites</li><li value=3>Safety hazard detection and prevention</li></ul>The system&#39;s best feature is how it ranks risks by severity. It scans thousands of items and highlights urgent ones, acting like an always-alert risk analyst. Teams found this extra helpful during COVID-19 when they needed better remote insights into their projects.<h3>Procore&#39;s reliance on third-party AI tools</h3>Procore takes a different path from Autodesk&#39;s in-house AI. The platform makes shared work possible with specialized AI providers through its App Marketplace, offering AI features through outside integrations.The company builds its AI strategy on openness instead of creating everything internally. Procore launched SmartBid AI to improve preconstruction processes through machine learning. Estimators can quickly spot differences in subcontractor bids - a job that usually takes hours of manual work.For managing risks, Procore works with companies to provide visual monitoring. This team-up adds computer vision that catches safety violations and tracks productivity without Procore building these features themselves.This flexible approach puts Procore a step behind Autodesk in built-in AI features. Users often buy extra subscriptions to access advanced AI tools, which complicates both buying and using the system.<h3>Impact on safety and schedule predictability</h3>AI changes construction work beyond just tech differences. Safety improvements stand out as one of the biggest wins, as AI catches potential dangers before accidents happen.Projects become more predictable with AI help. Construction IQ analyzes past data to help teams spot possible delays early. This lets them fix issues before they become emergencies.Both platforms still need to mature their AI. Construction IQ looks promising but needs human eyes to verify its suggestions. Procore&#39;s partnership approach brings specialized features but lacks the smooth integration of built-in tools.Teams should pick their platform based on what kind of predictions they need. Autodesk works better for teams wanting everything built-in, while Procore fits those looking for specialized tools through partners.Cortex offers another option with its specialized construction project management and workflow automation. Its cloud platform gives real-time insights without big system complexity, yet delivers key predictive features for construction work.

AI and Predictive Insights: Who’s Ahead?

Construction projects spanning multiple regions create unique scaling challenges. Business expansion globally turns minor software capabilities into mission-critical tools to maintain consistency and control.<h3>User management across regions</h3>Autodesk and Procore show clear differences in managing teams across locations. Autodesk Construction Cloud provides centralized user management that lets administrators control all account members from one interface. The system enables you to:<ul class="list-bullet"><li value=1>Modify project administrators&#39; capabilities</li><li value=2>Assign different companies and roles to team members</li><li value=3>Apply permissions based on predefined roles quickly</li></ul>Autodesk&#39;s system gives detailed access control. Administrators can enable or disable specific product access for individual team members. Large organizations benefit from this detail to maintain security standards while giving external partners appropriate access.Procore takes a different path by positioning itself as a platform for unlimited users. Teams can easily work together as the business grows. The platform offers &quot;unlimited access to support&quot; as part of their business model. This approach removes the hassle of adding new licenses as projects expand.<h3>Support for complex delivery models like IPD and modular</h3>Construction methods have evolved beyond traditional approaches, and software needs to adapt. Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) brings all project participants together as a unified team from day one.Autodesk Construction Cloud was &quot;purpose-built for advanced delivery models&quot; like IPD and modular construction. Teams can:<ul class="list-bullet"><li value=1>Handle multi-model coordination directly</li><li value=2>Optimize preconstruction through model-based quantity takeoffs</li><li value=3>Track modular construction</li></ul>Procore faces challenges with high-complexity, high-collaboration projects since it was designed for traditional project management. The platform&#39;s strength lies in connecting stakeholders through a &quot;single source of truth&quot; that enhances communication across delivery models.<h3>Which platform scales better for enterprise use?</h3>Enterprise-level operations need more than just user counts. They require efficient workflows and minimal administrative overhead.Procore&#39;s approach to scaling can get pricey for large organizations. New licenses and services need individual addition. Yet, 70% of ENR 400 companies use their platform, which shows strong enterprise adoption despite these challenges.Autodesk Construction Cloud offers several benefits:<ul class="list-bullet"><li value=1>Platform support for teams of all sizes and locations</li><li value=2>Built-in enterprise security and compliance standards</li><li value=3>Quick onboarding and simple administration for scattered teams</li></ul>Companies that switch to Autodesk report better control of geographically distributed project teams, a crucial factor for multinational operations.Your choice depends on your priorities. Procore excels at unlimited user access while Autodesk shines with centralized administration and sophisticated model-based workflows.

Scalability and Global Project Readiness

Your team&#39;s daily interaction with construction management software can make it either a valuable tool or an expensive roadblock. The differences in user experience between Procore and Autodesk Build might look small during demos but become crucial during daily use.<h3>Interface design: folder-based vs visual workflows</h3>Autodesk Construction Cloud uses a traditional folder-based organization that feels familiar to anyone who has used standard file systems. The design puts function before looks, which makes it available to teams moving from standard document management.Procore chose a different path with its interface and earned widespread praise for its clean, accessible design. The user-friendly layout works well for team members who don&#39;t have much technical experience. One user pointed out that Procore serves as &quot;more of a full management software&quot; compared to other options.Different users have different viewpoints. Some professionals say that &quot;Autodesk Build has a more modern look and accessibility features&quot;. Others think PlanGrid (now part of Autodesk) has &quot;a slightly more straightforward user interface&quot; than Procore. These mixed opinions show that interface priorities depend on each team&#39;s workflows and needs.<h3>Training resources and certification programs</h3>Both platforms put significant resources into education. Procore gives away free certification programs to anyone who wants to learn. They offer role-specific courses for project managers, superintendents, field workers, and seven other specialties. Users can add these self-paced, online certifications to their LinkedIn profiles to boost their credentials.Autodesk also provides certifications for multiple skill levels, from foundational to expert. They work with Credly to give digital credentials that show achievement or help organizations verify talent. Their preparation resources include courses with practice tests that build core skills needed to pass the exam.<h3>Adoption speed across departments</h3>Teams don&#39;t adopt technology at the same pace. Research shows that &quot;You&#39;re going to encounter different learning curves. Some will pick up [the software] easily, while those with steeper learning curves may be uncomfortable with new technology&quot;.New users often learn Procore faster because of its accessible design. Cortex provides specialized construction project management with efficient workflows that teams can implement quickly without much retraining, making it a great choice for teams who want simpler adoption paths.

User Experience and Learning Curve

Your specific construction management needs should guide your choice between Procore and Autodesk. Procore&#39;s percentage-based pricing includes unlimited users and storage. This makes it perfect for teams that need extensive collaboration on multiple projects. Autodesk takes a different approach with modular licensing. You only pay for the tools you need, which can save money during slow periods or market downturns.The hidden costs can add up quickly. Training expenses vary between platforms. Procore&#39;s implementation costs range from $10,000 for smaller contractors to over $100,000 for large multi-division companies. Autodesk provides training packages with specific hourly allocations. Your total investment will also include data migration, third-party integration fees, and ongoing support charges.Both platforms have their strengths. Autodesk&#39;s BIM-first approach works great for teams that rely on model-based workflows. Teams save 80% of time on RFIs through immediate model access. Procore excels at field collaboration with tools built for practical site management. Mobile capabilities show clear differences too. Autodesk performs better offline, while Procore has better photo documentation features.The integration options set these platforms apart. Autodesk connects design and construction phases smoothly with over 400 pre-built integrations. Procore&#39;s open API and App Marketplace includes 500+ integrations. This gives you more flexibility for custom development.Autodesk leads in AI with its Construction IQ technology for risk forecasting. Procore uses third-party AI tools through partnerships. Large operations might prefer Autodesk&#39;s integrated platform support and centralized administration. Yet Procore remains popular, with 70% of ENR 400 companies using it.Teams looking for a better option might like Cortex. It offers specialized construction project management with built-in workflow automation. The <a href="https://cortex-dm.com/who-we-serve/pm">cloud-based construction project management platform</a> gives you immediate project insights without complex enterprise systems. Cortex handles document management, field data collection, and team communication effectively.Pick software that fits your main workflows instead of chasing fancy features. The best solution tackles your biggest challenges within budget. The platform should also work well with your current systems to make implementation easier.The success of your software depends on how well you implement it. Look for platforms with good training resources and an accessible interface that your team can learn quickly. When you match these factors to your needs, you&#39;ll find the right construction management platform for your success.

Conclusion

Your choice between Procore and Autodesk construction software will affect your project outcomes and bottom line more than you might think. Both platforms boast impressive credentials. Autodesk Construction Cloud powers over 2 million projects, and Procore serves 70% of ENR 400 companies. The real question is - which platform delivers the best value for your needs?

Procore and Autodesk Construction Cloud take different approaches to pricing and functionality. Autodesk's modular licensing lets you pay for just the tools you need. Procore bases its pricing on a percentage of your total construction volume. This difference can significantly change your long-term costs. The comparison goes beyond just price tags to real-life performance. Procore's users handle 48% more construction volume. Autodesk users can expect a 20x ROI by the end of 2024.

Both platforms shine in ways you might miss during demo sessions. Autodesk users cut their RFI resolution time by 80% with live model access. Procore stands out at managing subcontractors and tracking progress through photo uploads. Your best choice depends on understanding both the advertised features and the hidden aspects that sales teams rarely discuss.

This piece breaks down each platform's actual offerings, potential hidden costs, and helps you find the solution that lines up with your construction management needs.

Procore vs Autodesk: Hidden Costs & Features Builders Miss